![]()

Minnesota Department
of Human Services
Consumer-Directed Services Budget
Formula MR/RC Waiver
Background
Several
years ago, the Department of Human Services (DHS) agreed to develop a standard
way to identify budget amounts for people wanting to use the Consumer-Directed
Community Supports (CDCS) service under the Mental Retardation or Related
Conditions (MR/RC) Waiver program. DHS agreed to do this at the urging of
families of consumers, advocates and county agencies. Stakeholders shared
concerns that too much variation existed from county to county and case manager
to case manager in how budgets were determined. Because there was little
experience and few guidelines existed for establishing consumer-directed
service budgets, it was unclear that individual budgets consistently related to
the needs of individual situations in an equitable manner.
Families of
consumers also expressed frustration with wide variations in how flexible
counties were willing to be regarding needed changes in the plans for spending
the consumer budget. At the same time, counties expressed that it was
increasingly difficult to defend the decisions of the county about some
consumer requests.
As data
became more available, DHS did see that there was a lot of variation in how
counties established budgets and in the guidelines that counties developed
about the use of funding.
During the
2002 and 2003 legislative session, legislators approached DHS to voice concerns
based on contacts with families of consumers, county agencies and advocates
that left legislators with the following impressions:
As a result
of growing concerns over budgeting and plans to expand CDCS, the Office of the
Legislative Auditor was asked by legislators to review the management of waiver
programs, including the rules applying to CDCS. The Legislative Audit report
recommended changes to CDCS that are consistent with those currently being
implemented.
Federal Involvement
In order to
make the needed changes, DHS worked with stakeholders in Minnesota and
officials in the federal government. Federal requirements for the budget
methodology changes included:
After many
months of negotiation about the budget methodology and other rules governing
CDCS, Minnesotas application for an amendment to the states waiver plan was
approved in March of 2004. The approval allowed a six-month preparation period
before new policies were put in force and the new budget method implemented.
The approval also allowed additional transition time for people who already
were using CDCS.
The federal
approval includes that beginning Oct. 1, 2004:
Establishing a Budget Method
The CDCS
budget method formula uses twenty-eight Characteristics/Variables and a
Constant to develop the individual budget. The formula was developed using a
sample of 11,697 waiver recipients meeting the following criteria:
The
analysis looked at the costs for services during calendar year 2003. Actual
costs were used (not authorized
levels) in order to assure that budget neutrality is maintained. In addition,
half of the case management costs for each individual were set aside in order
to insure that counties are paid for the case management functions they are
required to do under Minnesota Statutes.
In
analyzing the sample, DHS identified those characteristics/variables that most
influence or predict costs, so that those characteristics will be considered
across all recipients when establishing a budget amount for an individual. In
this way, DHS was attempting to address the desire for people with similar
needs and situations to be entitled to similar budget amounts under CDCS.
After
completing initial research and running statistical models, DHS tested the
proposed formula. Testing included studying how the formula performed when
compared to actual service costs and utilization in 2003. DHS also studied the
impact of the formula on each countys budget. Since the county has no say in
either increasing or reducing the formula amount provided to individuals, DHS
had to ensure that sufficient funding remained in place to continue to provide
services to recipients not using CDCS. This included having to analyze which
CDCS recipients were likely to leave the CDCS option because the formula amount
is not as high as their current amount, and which people would likely choose to
enter the CDCS option because it provides them with more funding. Finally, this
all needed to be done without increasing state spending.
DHS
provided counties with this same data in order to verify information by an
independent source and to solicit feedback about the impact of the formula amounts
on recipients. Based on feedback, DHS did refine the formula.
The actual
formula for determining individual budgets is as follows:
(Calendar
Year 2003 total daily weights per person) x (0.9964) x (0.70)
NOTE: The 0.9964 factor reflects
the 1% reduction imposed in the 2003 legislative session. The 0.70 factor was
necessary to keep counties within budgets provided to them.
From the
earliest stages of discussion, DHS openly discussed the advantages and
disadvantages of a formula approach. This approach does ensure improved consistency and equity in how budgets are
established for consumers. If a person changes his/her residence to another
county, for instance, the CDCS budget would remain the same. However, in using
a statistically based formula to set an individual budget, the budget amount
provided to an individual reflects an average cost for a group of people or a
particular characteristic.
Because
Minnesotas MR/RC Waiver was originally developed to convert institutional
services to community alternatives, the approved waiver plan has never imposed
an individual cap on the amount that a county could authorize for an individual
person. Instead, counties have been and continue to be responsible to remain
overall within an allowable budget. This has provided flexibility to serve
people with extremely challenging needs, including people with long
institutional histories and no active family involvement. So, the decision to
use a formula within this general structure meant that people choosing CDCS
would be required to forego the flexibility of individual budget setting in
order to get flexibility for how money is spent.
DHS
maintains data about individual recipients in its Medicaid Management
Information System (MMIS). DHS collects data about recipients of waivered
services in several ways:
Using
existing data, DHS identified the following Characteristics/Variables and
Weights/Amounts to determine the factor for the total daily rate for
individual users of CDCS:
|
Characteristics (Variables) |
Weights/
Amounts |
Range* |
Screening
Field |
|
Age Group |
19.432 |
1-4 |
8 |
|
Level of Support & Services |
48.724 |
1-4 |
37 |
|
Risk Status |
-56.839 |
1-4 |
39 |
|
Profile |
-4.263 |
1-4 |
Derived Field* |
|
DTH Service Authorization Level |
-8.737 |
1-3 |
Derived Field* |
|
Medical |
9.934 |
0-5 |
26 |
|
Mobility |
4.780 |
0-8 |
30 |
|
Mental Health Services |
14.358 |
0-1 |
45G |
|
Self Preservation |
5.973 |
1-3 |
34 |
|
Childhood Psychosis |
35.518 |
0-1 |
12-15 |
|
Cerebral Palsy |
8.394 |
0-1 |
12-15 |
|
Epilepsy |
7.004 |
0-1 |
12-15 |
|
Seizures |
2.151 |
0-5 |
29 |
|
Level of Mental Retardation |
5.128 |
1-4 |
12-15 |
|
Related Condition(s) |
13.063 |
0-1 |
12-15 |
|
Vocational |
-1.481 |
0-6 |
35 |
|
Leisure & Recreation |
2.590 |
0-5 |
36E |
|
Occupational Therapy |
5.078 |
0-1 |
45C |
|
Community Living |
3.248 |
0-5 |
36D |
|
Daily Living Skills/House Mgmt |
-3.108 |
0-5 |
36B |
|
Expressive Communication |
1.086 |
0-8 |
32 |
|
Aggressive, Verbal/Gestural |
1.629 |
0-5 |
38D |
|
Aggressive, Physical |
7.188 |
0-5 |
38C |
|
Property Destruction |
5.627 |
0-5 |
38F |
|
Inappropriate Sexual Behavior |
4.093 |
0-5 |
38E |
|
Injurious to Self |
2.910 |
0-5 |
38B |
|
Breaks Law |
7.782 |
0-5 |
38H |
|
Runs Away |
4.980 |
0-5 |
38G |
|
Constant |
-120.534 |
|
|
A code of 99on the DD Screening Document
always scores a 0 in the budget methodology
* Derived
Field- obtain value from
your county agency
Explanation of Characteristics (Variables)
All of the
listed Characteristics/Variables are data elements reported on or derived from
the DD Screening Document, collected as a part of a full-team screening process
done by the county. In total, there are twenty-eight Characteristics/Variables
and a Constant. The statistical analysis that was done looks at those
Characteristics/Variables which most predict or influence the actual cost for
services to individual waiver recipients. You will note that some
Characteristics/Variables actually have a negative relationship. The
Characteristics/Variables used are those, which consistently show a strong
relationship, both positive and negative, based on data collected by MMIS. Only those that are statistically
significant are being used.
The
following Characteristics/Variables are used to identify scores for calculating
the formula amounts. The county also receives a manual and periodic training on
how to code the specific variables so that consistent definitions are used in
determining the correct coding and range for each. The DD Screening Document
Codebook for the DD Screening Document can be found on the following DHS
Website: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/ddsdcb
Age
Group: Scoring
consists of four categories
1 = Birth
to 17.5 years
2 = 17.5
years to 21 years
3 = 21
years to 28.5 years
4 = Over
28.5 years
Level of
Support & Services: There are five levels from Person accesses supports as needed to Persons requires 24-hour awake supervision. A code of Unknown or 99 scores 0.
Risk
Status: All
waiver recipients score 1.
Profile: The profile (1-4) that determines how much the state
allocates to the countys budget for the slot used by a recipient, with 1 being the highest need.
*Note: Profile is a derived field. Your
county agency can give you the profile number by looking in the MR/RC Waiver
Management System.
DT&H
Service Authorization Level: There are three levels from Intensive to Minimal that
reflect the level of supervision needed during the day based on the assessed
need of the person, regardless of whether the person receives DT&H
services. A code of 1 requires the
most intensive assistance.
*Note: DT&H
Service Authorization Level is a derived
field. Your county agency can give you the score on this field by
looking in the MR/RC Waiver Management System.
(Increases to the CDCS budget because a person is accessing DT&H
services are accounted for in the Age Groups.)
Medical: Consists of six levels from No serious/specialized medical needs to Needs on-site medical attention 24 hours/day.
A code of Unknown or 99 scores
0.
Mobility: Consists of nine levels from No impairment to Not mobile due to overriding medical needs. A code of Unknown or 99 scores 0.
Mental
Health Services:
This indicates if Mental Health services are to be included in the service
plan. A code of Y scores 1; a
code of N scores 0.
Self
Preservation:
There are four levels from Is capable of
self-preservation to Is not capable
of self-preservation. A code of 99
scores 0.
Child
Psychosis: If
an ICD-9 code of 299 appears in fields 12, 13, 14 or 15, score 1. If the code does not appear, score 0.
Cerebral
Palsy: If an
ICD-9 code of 343 appears in fields 12, 13, 14 or 15, score 1. If the code does not appear, score 0.
Epilepsy: If an ICD-9 code of 345
appears in fields 12, 13, 14 or 15, score 1.
If the code does not appear,
score 0.
Seizures:
There are six
levels from No history or evidence of
seizures to Seizures - uncontrolled.
A code of 99 scores 0.
Level of
Mental Retardation:
There are four levels of ICD-9 codes from Mild
to Profound mental retardation.
1 = an
ICD-9 code of 317 (mild mental retardation) or 319 (unspecified mental
retardation)
2 = an
ICD-9 code of 318 (moderate mental retardation)
3 = an
ICD-9 code of 318.1 (severe mental retardation)
4 = an
ICD-9 code of 318.2 (profound mental retardation)
Related
Condition(s): This
variable is a yes if the person meets the definition in Minnesota statutes
and regulations. A 1 = a diagnosis
code of V79.8
Vocational:
There are seven
levels from Independent requires typical
training to Needs intensive support
with or without adaptations.
0 = Code of
Unknown or 99
1 = Code of
05 - Needs intensive support - with or without adaptations
2 = Code of
04 - Needs moderate support - with or without adaptations
3 = Code of
03 - Needs minimal support - with or without adaptations
4 = Code of
02 - Needs on the job training - time limited
5 = Code of
01 - Independent - requires typical training; may use adaptations
6 = Code of
09 - N/A (explain in NOTES section)
Leisure
& Recreation: There are six levels from Independent
to Person unable to participate in an
activity. A code of 99 scores
0.
Occupational
Therapy: This
indicates if Occupational Therapy is to be included in the service plan. A code
of Y scores 1; a code of N scores 0.
Community
Living: There
are six levels from Independent to Person unable to participate in an activity.
A code of 99 scores 0.
Daily
Living Skills/Household Management: There are six levels from Independent to Person unable
to participate in an activity.
0 = Code of
Unknown or 99
1 = Code of
05 - Person unable to participate in activity
2 = Code of
04 - Person participates with another's assistance for all or portions of an
activity
3 = Code of
03 - Instruction required with expected outcome of increased independence
4 = Code of
02 - Minimal supervision (formal program not needed
5 = Code of
01 - Independent
Expressive
Communication:
There are nine levels from Functional
to Does not have functional expressive
communication. A code of 99
scores 0.
Aggressive,
Verbal/Gestural: There six levels from having None
(no demonstrated verbal aggression) to Very
Severe. A code of 99 scores
0.
Aggressive,
Physical:
There six levels from having None (no
demonstrated physical aggression) to Very
Severe. A code of 99 scores
0.
Property
Destruction: There
six levels from having None (no
demonstrated property destruction) to Very
Severe. A code of 99 scores
0.
Inappropriate
Sexual Behavior: There six levels from having None
(no demonstrated inappropriate sexual behavior) to Very Severe. A code of 99
scores 0.
Injurious
to Self:
There six levels from having None (no
demonstrated self-injurious behavior) to Very
Severe. A code of 99 scores
0.
Breaks
Laws: There six
levels from having None (no
demonstrated breaking laws/criminal offenses) to Very Severe. A code of 99
scores 0.
Runs
Away: There
six levels from having None (no
demonstrated running away) to Very Severe.
A code of 99 scores 0.
Constant: The constant is applied to
every individual and is based on the actual calendar year 2003 waiver and home
care costs (less half of the case management costs) of non-CDCS recipients.
When the values of the Characteristics/Variables 1-28 are added, the total
amount will consistently exceed the actual amounts that were spent. The
statistical modeling anticipates this and generates an amount (Constant) to
assure a neutral starting point.
How To Calculate An Individual Budget Amount
Step
1: Each Characteristic/Variable
is assigned a dollar Weight/Amount. See the chart on page 4 and with the Explanation of Characteristics (Variables) on page 5.
Step 2: Multiply the
Weight/Amount for each Characteristic/Variable times the applicable Range/rating score determined by the individual
DD Screening Document. See Explanation of
Characteristics (Variables) on page 5 to assure you are using the
range correctly. For example:
Continue to calculate for each
Characteristic/Variable in the same manner.
Step
3: Add
the values calculated in Step 2 for each variable. This subtotal creates your Total Daily Weight.
Step 4: Multiply the Total Daily
Weight (from Step 3) by 0.9964.
Step
5: Multiply
the amount in Step 4 by 0.70. (This produces your Daily Average)
Step 6:
Round the Daily Average Amount to the nearest penny and multiply this by
365 days. This is your Individual Budget Amount.
What Should Consumer Families Do?
The most
important things that consumers and their families can do to assure that their
budget amounts are accurate and
future planning is completed include:
What Counties Should Be Doing
Each county
received information about the changes to CDCS in March of 2004. DHS has
offered opportunities to all counties to participate in training events
sponsored by DHS. Counties have also been encouraged to update local policies
and procedures by Oct. 1, 2004. DHS staff have been available upon request to
provide consultation to counties as the counties prepare and plan for the
changes.
In August
of 2004, DHS distributed the final report to the counties on the new individual
budget amounts for current CDCS recipients. DHS asked the counties to:
1)
For
recipients with budgets that entitle them to an increase (and if they need
additional services), meet to review the service plan and make any changes that
are necessary
2)
For
recipients with a budget that decreases, explain the transition time available,
explain all other entitlement to service under the waiver, and begin the
process of determining what steps to take over the course of the next 18 months